Rogue/Fake app, the mother of all threats. It can be created in hours and be distributed to masses through social media. Once a user downloads and uses it once, he/she becomes a permanent victim. Using these stolen credentials, the thief can repeatedly misuse the user’s account without the organization and without the user realizing fraud.
Apart from the rogue/fake app threat, there are many other threats which can severely compromise business.
All currently used technologies, checks, and protections can be broken by changing just a few lines of java code, even if a C++ module is used. For a thief, the time and the effort spent on bypassing protections will not be a deterrent as the probability of distributing a rogue app and further misusing it remains exactly the same.
SecureChannel Virtualization Technology is the only known technology that can provide comprehensive protection against the rogue/fake app and all other threats.
Mobile Security Solution - Features
Feature Comparison
SecureChannel provides comprehensive security, covering almost all known threats.
| Feature | SecureChannel | All Other Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Rogue/Fake App detection | ||
| Remote Desktop Program detection | * | |
| Detection of reverse engineering | ||
| Prevention of Authentication data phishing | ||
| Business data theft protection | ||
| Device authentication | * | |
| Anti-tampering protection | * | |
| Channel security | * | |
| Virtual Private Network | ||
| Malicious code detection | ||
| Encryption Key stealing protection | ||
| Rooting/ Jail-break / Emulator/Simulator detection | * | |
| Root detection bypass framework protection | ||
| Integrated real-time risk/fraud engines | ||
| * | ||
How We Stand?
SecureChannel focuses way beyond anti-tampering, device authentication, and channel security. The main objective is reducing the probability of carrying out a fraudulent transaction to zero. With SecureChannel, breaking of security requires physical possession of user's mobile device and carrying out device specific cracking within a second. This is not practically impossible.
| All Other Solutions | SecureChannel | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | They can't prevent phishing of user, device, app, and network credentials required for successful authentication. |
It prevents phishing of device, app, and network credentials required for successful authentication. |
| 2 | All security checks are based on static external properties and static code which can be easily obtained, modified, bypassed, fooled, substituted, etc. |
Breaking of security requires physical possession of user’s rooted mobile device and dynamic cracking of C++ module, within a few second. This is practically impossible. |
| 3 | They can't prevent app modifications. Anti-tampering check can be broken easily. |
It prevents creation of a modified app. Nearly impossible to break anti-tampering check. |
| 4 | Once broken, ALL users of ALL organizations can potentially become victims. |
Individual user’s mobile requires cracking. This is not practical. |
| 5 | They cover only limited threats. |
It covers a wide range of threats. |
| 6 | Once anti-tampering check is broken, it is very easy to carry out fraudulent transaction. |
Virtually impossible to carry out fraudulent transaction. |